Members login:
Calendar:
September 2010
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Categories:

Cubs find their CFer by inking Marlon Byrd

January 2nd, 2010

On the final day of the 2009 calendar the Cubs purchased their centerfielder for the 2010 season in the 32 year old Marlon Byrd.  Byrd has long been on Hendry’s list of players to acquire and when he become eligible in free agency this season he was at the top of the Cubs’ wishlist but Milton Bradley had to be dealt first.  The right handed hitting Byrd just served up his career year in his walk season and his first full season as a full-time player since 2003, in 146 games, Byrd posted a line of .283/.329/.479/.808 with 43 2bs, 3 3bs, 20 hrs, 89 rbi, and 8/12 in stolen bases.  For more on Byrd and the Cubs future keep reading…

This isn’t the first time Hendry has dipped into Texas to acquire an outfielder, actually it’s the fourth time in the past four years (Soriano 2007, DeRosa 2007, Bradley 2009, Byrd 2010).  Byrd just had his best year of his career as a 32 year old which is usually the tail end of a positional players’ prime offensive potential.  Although Mark DeRosa was 32 when he first entered his Chicago tenure and showed off two plus offensive seasons before the Cubs traded him away in his third and final year of his contract.  Chicago is hoping to get the same results out of Marlon Byrd who will enter the 2010 season as a 32 year old as well after playing in his first full season since 2003.

Like most of Hendry’s contracts, Byrd’s is backloaded; Marlon gets 3M this year, 5.5M in 2011 and 6.5M in 2012.  As of right now, Byrd rates as an average defensive centerfield with a strong bat and power potential.  Most expectations have Marlon playing the next two seasons in centerfield and finishing out his contract in rightfield with Fukudome likely departed prior to the 2012 season.  Even if Byrd doesn’t reproduce his 2009 line, as long as he stays close to his career average line of .279/.340/.479/.808, he should be helpful in Chicago for the next two years.

Offensively, Byrd has the potential to surprise many next year with his power ability.  Byrd puts the bat on the ball, often making contact when he shouldn’t be swinging.  He still needs to work on his ability to induce walks and his tendency to strikeout work against him.  Marlon has had poor splits away from his home field advantage in Texas but switching over to the NL Central where there are several hitter friendly ballparks and the competition is weaker should generate positive offensive years in 2010 and 2011.  Defensively last year, Byrd rated exactly as a league average centerfielder, the thought is moving to the less spacious Friendly Confines should benefit him.  Marlon has the abilities to play anywhere in the outfield with plus results, albeit his highest value is patrolling center for the Northsiders.

Byrd’s 15M/3YR contract with only 3M due this year allows the Cubs to add another salary now or even more so at the trade deadline in July.  Byrd’s peak value is in 2010 and 2011, by 2012 it’s conceivable that Marlon is regulated to 4th outfielder status.  Although the Cubs believe that he’ll excel with the switch to the NL Central and will have peak value in 2012 allowing him to reach Type A status or the abilty to deal him for young top prospects.  Nevertheless, the Cubs got a good overall deal with Byrd, the years aren’t ideal but the money is where it is at especially in 2010 allowing the Cubs to add another salary if need be.

Posted by Bob Sacamento in Bob's View, Cubs News

2 Responses to “Cubs find their CFer by inking Marlon Byrd”

  1. cubfanbrad says:

    I’m OK with this signing given our budget constraints, and the lack of any other reasonable FA CFs (No thanks on Pods or Ankiel). I do think that last year, where Byrd will be a 34-year old backup outfielder making $6.5 mil will be a problem.

    I hate backloaded deals, but given our aging roster I think we have to be in win-now mode. Good or bad, we also have alot of contracts expiring soon, with Lilly, DLee representing $25 mil, and A-Ram another $16 mil if he opts out.

    Signing Byrd was probably the only realistic option that didn’t cost prospects, other than a Milton Bradley/Gary Matthews Jr. kind of trade, which obviously didn’t happen.

  2. Bob Sacamento says:

    Personally, I’m not a fan of backloaded deals but Jim has made it nearly a must for all of his contracts; Save money today and overpay for tomorrow. Byrd should see a strong line in his first (and likely second) year in the NL and occupy an average CF especially in Wrigley. That third year though could be problematic.

    As for winning now, 2010 is the year or else we face a major rebuilding season or two especially with our NL Central competition growing yearly and veterans entering the end of their career.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


 

Poll:

What Cubs Will be Traded by the Deadline?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Comments:
A Look at Possible Cubs’ 2010 First Rounders
By: Bob Sacamento
Yep another Wilken pick...

A Look at Possible Cubs’ 2010 First Rounders
By: ackidom4
I gotta say I doubt anyone saw...

Soriano homers twice as Cubs double-up D’Backs 10-5..
By: cubfanbrad
Many called for...

Uuuuuuh, Zambrano to the Bullpen?
By: Bob Sacamento
Zman made his first appearance in relief...

Links:
Cubs Links
A League of Her Own
Bricks & Ivy Radio
CubsNet.com
KeepitWrigley.com
The Cub Reporter

Paid Sponsors
http://www.partycasino.com
online baseball betting
online casinos
Research Paper